
Are There Different Types Of
Yes. The role of the mediator is a bit different in
eachtypeand most mediators utilize a combination of these types.
Facilitative Mediation:
In a facilitative mediation, the mediator will take an active role in
controlling the "process." The mediator asks questions to identify the
interests of the parties and the real issues in the disagreement. The
mediator helps the parties explore solutions that benefit both parties.
In a facilitative mediation, the mediator does not offer an opinion on
the strengths and weaknesses of the parties' cases. The mediator does
not suggest solutions.
Transformative Mediation:
Transformative mediators try to change the nature of interaction by a)
helping each party appreciate each others viewpoints; and b) by
strengthening each party’s ability to handle disagreement in
a productive positive manner. The mediator will intervene in the
conversation between the parties in order to call attention to moments
of recognition and empowerment. Ground rules for the mediation are set
only if the parties set them. The mediator does not direct the parties
to topics or issues. Instead, the mediator follows the
parties’ conversation and assist them to talk about what they
think is important. The transformative mediator does not offer an
opinion on the strengths or weaknesses of the parties’ cases.
The mediator does not suggest solutions.
Evaluative Mediation:
Evaluative mediators use their expertise to focus and assist parties:
a) to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their legal or other
positions; and b) to achieve settlements. In evaluative mediation, the
mediator controls the process and suggests solutions for resolving the
conflict. Individual meetings between the mediator and one party at a
time (caucuses) are a major component of evaluative mediation. The
focus of an evaluative mediation is primarily upon reaching a
settlement. The mediators will make their best efforts to get the
parties to compromise, if necessary, to achieve a result.
Conciliation:
This process is similar to mediation but the conciliator acts more as
an 'inventor' of solutions which are presented to the parties with a
view of getting them to agree as to how the disagreement can be
resolved. The conciliation mediator frequently provides suggestions and
out-of-the-box ideas. Conciliation differs from mediation in that the
main goal is to conciliate, most of the time by seeking concessions.
Generally there is a mixture of fact-to-face and private caucuses
sometimes referred to as ‘shuttle diplomacy’. The
conciliator meets with each party to separately prioritize a list of
interests from most to least important. Then goes back and forth
between the parties and encourages them to "give" on the issues one at
a time, starting with the least important and working toward the most
important for each party in turn. The parties rarely place the same
priorities on all objectives, and usually have some objectives that are
not on the list. The conciliator builds a string of agreements and help
the parties create an atmosphere of trust which the conciliator can
continue to develop into a ‘total’ mutually
agreeable resolution.
Expert Determination:
Historically, this form of mediation has been used when the parties
have strong defined positions that need to be subjected to an
‘expert’ or panel of experts to evaluate their
positions, define the specific interests and help craft a suitable
solution. The expert mediator(s) are very knowledgeable and possesses
years of expertise in the area of the disagreement, dispute or
conflict. Both parties of the mediation respect and trust the
mediator(s) to help them resolve their differences and craft a solution
that will be mutually beneficial to them and to their particular field
or industry. Often the mediation details are not confidential, except
for trade secrets, as industry policies and guidelines are often
determined. The mediator(s) is empowered to make a settlement and/or
policy which may or may not be agreeable to either party.
LOCATE MEDIATOR DIRECTORY www.LocateMediator.com
Are There Different Types Of
- What Is Mediation?
- How Is Mediation Different From Legal Litigation?
- When Is Mediation Useful?
- What Kind Of Disagreement Can Be Mediated?
- Who Should Consider Mediation?
- What does Mediation do?
- What Are The Most Important Aspects Of Mediation?
- What Are The Direct Benefits Of Mediation?
- Who Wins, Who Loses In Mediation?
- When Is The Best Time To Begin Mediation?
- Who Can Request Mediation?
- What Goes On At A Mediation Session?
- How Do The Parties And The Mediator Work Together?
- During The Mediation, What Does The Mediator(s)Do?
- How Long Does Mediation Take?
- Why Use Mediation If We Are Unable To Agree?
- Do I Need To Hire A Lawyer To Mediate?
- If I Don’t Bring A Lawyer Can I Bring Someone To Help Assist Me?
- Is Mediation Legally Binding?
- If I Use Mediation, Will I Need To Go To Court?
- Must An Agreement Be Reached In Mediation?
- Can A Mediator Be A Witness Or Talk To The Judge?
- What Should I Know About A Mediator Before Choosing One?
- What Are The Advantages Of Mediation Over Litigation?
- Are There Different Types Of Mediation?
Need Addition Dispute Resolution Information? Use These Links:
Please review our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Websites regarding ADR, Mediation, Arbitration, Lawsuits, Ombudsman and Paralegal:
Need to Find a Mediator, Arbitrator, Lawyer/Attorney, Ombudsman or Paralegal?
Visit Our Legal Directories:
Mediation Services
